RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2009-00998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 55590, Programs and Work Control Superintendent. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He passed his 55590 AFSC test; however, it was never recorded in his record. His notice of his passing test results was lost in a 1981 house fire. The applicant does not provide any evidence in support of his appeal. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 22 July 1953, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 19. He was progressively promoted to the rank of master sergeant (E-7) with a date of rank of 1 August 1971. According to the applicant’s Air Force Form 7, Airman Military Record, he held a Duty AFSC of 55590 for the period 29 July 1968 through 14 December 1968. On 31 October 1973, the applicant was honorably discharged from active duty and retired effective 1 November 1973. He served 20 years, 3 months, and 9 days on active duty. His DD Form 214 reflects his AFSC as 55570, Programs and Work Control Technician. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDC recommends denying the applicant’s request. DPSIDC states that a thorough review of the applicant’s personnel records indicates he performed duty in AFSC 55590; however, he was not awarded this AFSC. Therefore, AFSC 55590 should not be reflected on his DD Form 214, as he possessed no other awarded AFSCs. The complete AFPC/DPSIDC evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 1 June 2009, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 24 September 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-00998: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Mar 09. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDC, dated 11 May 09. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jun 09. Panel Chair